Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ass Seen on TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:MUSIC Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 19:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ass Seen on TV

Per WP:Music: All articles on albums or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines. Individual articles on albums should include independent coverage. Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article, space permitting. LegoTech·(t)·(c) 01:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. Inline with the above comment, I feel the best thing to do is merge all the album information together. --Eustress (talk) 15:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep I think LegoTech either really doesn't like GOB or he hasn't even read WP:Music, because this is a notable album, by a notable artist. He's tagges almost every GOB related article for AFD, wouldn't that be abusing your rights to edit wikipedia?[The Spooky One] | ^{[t c r]} 20:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I believe this article has the potential to meet all basic expectations through normal editing. Google is your friend. -- WikHead (talk) 01:12, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep Major band + major label = no-brain keep. Either a bad faith or a misguided nom. — iridescent 14:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.